The International Classification of Headache Disorders from the point of view of Thomas Kuhn: a reflection

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.48208/HeadacheMed.2023.25

Keywords:

Headache, ICHD-3, Philosophy of science, Thomas Kuhn

Abstract

Headaches are characterized by a sensation of discomfort or pain in the cephalic
region. Due to the large number of types and subtypes of headaches, the standardization of their approach is necessary through the International Classification of
Headache Disorders (ICHD), a document that is currently in its 3rd edition (ICHD-3).
The evolution of the ICHD follows the hypothetical-deductive model of science based
on Karl Popper's philosophy, which has a strong presence in the health sciences.
The classification of headaches has evolved over time, incorporating and removing
criteria, reflecting the need to adapt the classification to constantly evolving scientific
and clinical demands. However, some changes can generate discrepancies between
clinical practice and the elaborated diagnostic tools. In this context, this article reflects
on whether it would be advantageous to return to old principles and foundations of
obsolete classifications. The criterion of osmophobia, which is no longer in use in
ICHD-3, is highlighted. This reflection can be developed following Thomas Kuhn's
(1922-1996) view on science. In his main work, "The Structure of Scientific Revolutions"
(1962), Kuhn proposes a three-stage model for science: the adoption of a paradigm,
normal science, and a period of crisis. Kuhn also proposes the principle of incommensurability to understand the limitations and complexities of science. The application
of this principle allows headache specialists to recognize that different approaches
to headache classification have their own limitations and complexities, encouraging
them to consider a variety of perspectives, paradigms, and theories in approaching
clinical cases and conducting scientific studies. An integrative approach that combines
Popper's hypothetical-deductive model with Kuhn's principle of incommensurability
allows headache specialists to have a broader and more critical understanding of
headache classifications.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Sarmento E, Melhado E, Andrade JR, Valença MM and Silva-Neto RP. Cefaleia. 1 ed. Recife, Pernambuco: EditoraAdvances In Science; 2022. 368 p.

Headache Classification Committee of the International Headache Society (IHS) The International Classification of Headache Disorders, 3rd edition Cephalalgia 2018; 38(1):1-211 Doi: 10.1177/0333102417738202 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0333102417738202

Popper K. The logic of scientific discovery. 2 ed. Sao Paulo, Brazil: Editora Cultrix; 2013. 456 p.

Popper K. The two fundamental problems of the theory of knowledge. 1 ed. São Paulo, Brazil: Editora Unesp; 2013. 800 p.

Kuhn TS. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. 13 ed. São Paulo, Brazil: Editora Unesp; 2013. 226 p.

Downloads

Published

2023-09-14

How to Cite

1.
Pagliarin LG, Pegoraro de Almeida JC, de Assis César AR. The International Classification of Headache Disorders from the point of view of Thomas Kuhn: a reflection. Headache Med [Internet]. 2023 Sep. 14 [cited 2024 May 4];14(2):128-30. Available from: https://headachemedicine.com.br/index.php/hm/article/view/772

Issue

Section

Opinion

Most read articles by the same author(s)