339
ASAA
Rocha EBS, Eberhardt CM, Tubero LA, Penatti LAT, Galego ARM
Encephalitis associated with Covid-19 and thunderclap headache: an unusual relationship
Introduction
T
he disease caused by the novel coronavirus is classical-
ly characterized by the involvement of the respiratory
system however it has a wide spectrum of manifestations,
including damage to the nervous system (NS). Retrospective
study developed in Wuhan in 2019 with 214 patients, still
at the beginning of the pandemic, showed a prevalence
of neurologic manifestations of 37%.
1
The most common
neurological symptom reported was headache, with differ-
ent characteristics and great heterogeneity among those
affected.
2
Thunderclap headache, as the name says, is a sudden
severe pain usually caused by potentially serious disorders,
mainly vascular disturbances, therefore it consists of a
medical emergency, especially when associated with
altered mental state.
3
In a recent study with 262 patients
with Covid-19 and headache around 25% presented
severe or very severe pain.
2
Another publication with
2,194 participants evidenced that red ags for headache
were present in 61% of the cases, but confusion was the
warning sign only in 6.2% and sudden onset just in 5.8%.
4
Here we report a case of a patient admitted at a hospital
reference in neurology with a suspect of hemorrhagic stroke
with a history of thunderclap headache plus altered mental
state without systemic symptoms and after investigation,
surprisingly, diagnosed with encephalitis associated with
Sars-CoV-2.
Case Report
Woman, 51 years-old, previous history positive just for
depression and systemic arterial hypertension, non-
smoker. Admitted at hospital reference to neurology
withsuspicion of hemorrhagic stroke, reporting seven days
of holocranial and sudden headache that has progressed
to severe intensity within minutes at onset. Associated with
evolution to mental confusion, inattention, inability to meet
family members and difculty of communicating at the day
of admission.
Admitted normotensive (130/70 mmHg), normocardic (96
bpm), saturating 97% without oxygen supplementation,
without respiratory distress and with a borderline pyrexia
of 37.7°C. General physical examination, including
respiratory auscultation, was normal. In the neurological
examination of admission, the patient was inattentive,
hypocontactant, drowsy but awake with verbal stimulus,
disoriented in time and space, unable to say her own
name or recognize her husband and with a language
disturbance, characterized by relative uent speech,
incapacity to name objects, repeat words or phrases and
to obey commands. The muscular thonus was normal and
the patient moved the four members without fall in decit
maneuvers. She had no signals of pyramidal liberation
or any other alteration at neurological examination,
including absence of neck stiffness.
General laboratory tests were normal. Brain and neck
computed angiotomography (CTA) excluded acute
bleeding, however showed one saccular aneurysm with
1.2 x 0.9 millimeters in the supraclinoid/paraophthalmic
segment of the left internal carotid artery (Figure 1).
We performed cerebrospinal uid (CSF) mainly with the
objective to rule out subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH)
and the liquid was clear without xanthochromia, but
with slight lymphomonocytic pleocytosis (8 leukocytes),
discrete protein elevation (53 mg/dL) and 34 red blood
cells. Electroencephalogram (EEG) showed symmetrical
and disorganized brain electrical activity with poor
anteroposterior differentiation, theta rhythm diffuse
and presence of triphasic waves, suggestive of an
encephalopathy.
Due to the hospital protocol during the Covid-19 pandemic,
the patient underwent computed tomography of the thorax
and we found ground-glass opacities involving around
25% to 50% of the lungs, predominantly at peripheral
regions, suggesting viral infection (Figure 2). Therefore,
RT-PCR for Sars-CoV-2 with nasopharyngeal swab was
performed with a positive result. Family members denied
respiratory complaints or any other symptoms and denied
contacts prior to the admission with conrmed or suspected
cases of coronavirus disease. The patient had not traveled
recently. The patient did not perform magnetic resonance
imaging due to the institution’s isolation rules for cases of
coronavirus disease.
After that, added to the exclusion of hemorrhagic stroke
and SAH, our suspicion was viral encephalitis. We started
empirical treatment with acyclovir and solicited sorologies
at cerebrospinal uid for herpes simplex virus and for
Sars-CoV-2. The rst result was negative, so the acyclovir
was suspended and the last result was positive, conrming
the diagnosis of Covid-19 encephalitis.
We opted to maintain just supportive care, without
immunosuppressive treatments. During hospitalization, the