Headache Medicine, v.3, n.4, p.198-235, Oct./Nov./Dec. 2012 225
SHORT COMMUNICATIONS
increased the risk in higher magnitude for chronic TMD
pain (1.41; 1.32-1.51) (Table 4).
DISCUSSION
The first finding of the present study refers to the high
prevalence rates of HAc and TMD. According to literature,
headache prevalence are up to 51% in children/
adolescents,
(5)
although mostly rates are of 2% to 5%.
(6)
Brazilian data about TMD and HAc in adolescents agree
with international rates for headaches prevalence but not
for TMD, which was surprisingly very high (about 30%).
However, a recent study with adolescents from Mexico
demonstrated similar prevalence of TMD, with 33.2%.
(7)
The reasons which may underlie this higher prevalence
should be further explored.
The second finding of this study refers to gender
differences. After stratifying adolescents by gender, females
demonstrated significant risks for the presence of HAc but
not for TMD, as similar previously observed in adults.
(3)
However, in the presence of both conditions, higher risks
were observed for girls with menarche. Based on this find,
we suggest that the hormonal related pain changes should
be explored in the future. It would be important to verify
how these changes affect the relationship between
headache and TMD, since most of researches exploring
gender differences in pain never consider these conditions
together.
Although a strong association between headaches
and TMD has been demonstrated, this relationship is still
poorly explored in adolescents. Considering TMD and
HA pain characteristics, it becomes also evident that the
relationship between them is complex, from both
pathophysiological and clinical perspectives. Basically,
there are two hypotheses to justify the association.
Clinically, TMD pain can characterize a "secondary
headache", since the temporalis is a masticatory muscle
located in the head. Considering pathophysiology, the
comorbidity of these two chronic pain conditions seems
to be related to central sensitization,
(8)
especially in
trigeminal subnucleus caudalis.
When interpreting the results, some points deserve
attention. First, HAc are based on adolescents responses
to one question, and consequently, no headache
diagnosis could be attributed. Second, a cross sectional
study allows the detection of association, but no causal